FierceFinanceFierceFinanceITFierceComplianceIT   FierceCIO

Moody's coding error leads to flawed ratings

Tools
Tags
Quality Assurance Issues
Glitch
Constant Proportion Debt Obligations

A Financial Times investigation has revealed that a coding flaw resulted in many so-called CPDOs, or constant proportion debt obligations, earning AAA ratings. A coding flaw? It's unclear whether the code was written internally, or whether it was part of a third-party system. Either way, it raises quality assurance issues. QA ranks low, but this is a reminder of how important the job is. The curious thing is that Standard & Poor's were also rating these securities AAA. No word of a glitch over there. But it suggests that there may be more to the story than just a mere coding flaw. A conspiracy theorist might suggest that someone hard-coded around the real code in order to get these securities the highest rating at Moody's.  

For more:
- here's the article

Related Articles:
S&P, Moody's bid for credibility
Moody's makes a few changes, keeps letters
Credit ratings agencies unmasked

Twitter   Facebook   LinkedIn   StumbleUpon  
Get Your FREE FierceFinanceIT Email Newsletter:
Be the first to comment

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

More information about formatting options

To combat spam, please enter the code in the image.